firewall builder classify action missing

#Firewall builder classify action missing software#
#Firewall builder classify action missing series#

fpc0 ACX_DFW_CFG_FAILED: ACX Error (dfw):dnx_dfw_create_hw_instance : Status:104 Could not program dfw(lo0.0-inet6-i) type(IFP_DFLT_INET6_Lo0_FILTER)! fpc0 ACX_DFW_CFG_FAILED: ACX Error (dfw):dnx_dfw_bind_shim : Could not create dfw(lo0.0-inet6-i) type(IFP_DFLT_INET6_Lo0_FILTER) fpc0 ACX_DFW_CFG_FAILED: ACX Error (dfw):dnx_dfw_update_resolve : Failed to bind filter(3) to bind point fpc0 ACX_DFW_CFG_FAILED: ACX Error (dfw):dnx_dfw_change_end : dnx_dfw_update_resolve (resolve type) failed This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on ACX Series: All versions prior to 20.2R3-S7 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S4 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S3 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S4 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R2. An indication that the filter was not installed can be identified with the following logs: fpc0 ACX_DFW_CFG_FAILED: ACX Error (dfw):dnx_dfw_rule_prepare : Config failed: Unsupported Ip-protocol 51 in the filter lo0.0-inet6-i fpc0 ACX_DFW_CFG_FAILED: ACX Error (dfw):dnx_dfw_rule_prepare : Please detach the filter, remove unsupported match and re-attach fpc0 ACX_DFW_CFG_FAILED: ACX Error (dfw):dnx_dfw_process_rule : Status:104 dnx_dfw_rule_prepare failed fpc0 ACX_DFW_CFG_FAILED: ACX Error (dfw):dnx_dfw_process_filter : Status:104 dnx_dfw_process_rule failed fpc0 ACX_DFW_CFG_FAILED: ACX Error (dfw):dnx_dfw_update_filter_in_hw : Status:104 Could not process filter(lo0.0-inet6-i) for rule expansion Unsupported match, action present. There is no immediate indication of an incomplete firewall filter commit shown at the CLI, which could allow an attacker to send valid packets to or through the device that were explicitly intended to be dropped.

#Firewall builder classify action missing series#

This issue affects all on-prem versions of Juniper Networks Paragon Active Assurance prior to 4.1.2.Īn Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type vulnerability in IPv6 firewall filter processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS on the ACX Series devices will prevent a firewall filter with the term 'from next-header ah' from being properly installed in the packet forwarding engine (PFE).

#Firewall builder classify action missing software#

The Paragon Active Assurance Software as a Service (SaaS) is not affected by this vulnerability since the timescaledb service is not enabled. Note: This issue only affects customers hosting their own on-prem Control Center. When the timescaledb container is started, this causes side-effects by bypassing the existing firewall rules and limitations for Test Agent communications. The timescaledb feature is installed as an optional package on the Control Center. OpenVPN is configured to not allow direct communication between Test Agents in the OpenVPN application itself, and routing is normally not enabled on the server running the CC application. Firewall rules exists to limit communication from TA's to the CC to specific services only. TA's are assigned an internal IP address in the 100.70.0.0/16 range. The Test Agents (TA) Appliance connects to the Control Center (CC) using OpenVPN. Users are advised to upgrade.Īn Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints vulnerability in the timescaledb feature of Juniper Networks Paragon Active Assurance (PAA) (Formerly Netrounds) allows an attacker to bypass existing firewall rules and limitations used to restrict internal communcations. There are no known workarounds to this issue. The issue has been patched in version 1.6.1. The latter might present a denial of service vector if a remote service’s web application firewall bans the application due to the receipt of malformed requests. An attacker that is able to control the header names that are passed to Slilm-Psr7 would be able to intentionally craft invalid messages, possibly causing application errors or invalid HTTP requests being sent out with an PSR-18 HTTP client. While the specification states that is used to terminate the header list, many servers in the wild will also accept . In versions prior to 1.6.1 an attacker could sneak in a newline ( ) into both the header names and values.

Slim/psr7 is a PSR-7 implementation for use with Slim 4. (A mitigation is that the remote harvesting server should be behind a firewall that only allows access to the Talend Data Catalog server.) Talend Data Catalog remote harvesting server before 8.0-20230413 contains a /upgrade endpoint that allows an unauthenticated WAR file to be deployed on the server.